πŸŽ“ AI & Education

Only 9% of young people believe schools are preparing them for the AI future.

87% of 11–24 year-olds in England are already using AI β€” but our education system is still teaching for a world that no longer exists. Physical AI and smart machines demand a new generation of human-centred technologists.

87%
of young people in England have used an AI tool (Public First, Aug 2026)
64th
UK rank for getting AI into public services β€” behind Bangladesh & Uganda
37%
of teachers say AI is not addressed at all across their subjects
20%
learning loss in closed-book exams for AI-using students (China study, 2026)
9%
Young people who feel well-prepared for AI
14%
Teachers confident in all 3 dimensions of AI literacy (Royal Society)
46%
Employers who say young people are unprepared for work
1M+
Young people NEET β€” highest level in 12+ years in the UK
Young people's reality

They're already living in the AI age. School hasn't caught up.

A nationally representative survey of 4,021 young people aged 11–24 in England (Public First, August 2026) reveals a generation that has already adapted β€” on their own terms, without support.

87%
of 11–24 year-olds in England have used an AI tool β€” usage exceeds 80% in every single age group
90%
of 13–14 year-olds report having used AI β€” many before age 10. 16% say they started under 10.
63%
of secondary school students have used AI to help with homework or coursework β€” AI is a default study tool
Why young people use AI tools
Find information quickly, like a search engine
51%
Help when they don't know how to do something
42%
Save time
39%
Understand school or work better
34%
Talk through problems or how they're feeling
40%

"Unless education changes, AI will steadily hollow out the conditions under which human intelligence, agency and confidence are formed."

β€” Sir Anthony Seldon, Britain's Greatest Education Opportunity Ever, Public First 2026
The equity gap

AI is widening the divides we promised to close.

For FSM, inclusion is not an afterthought β€” it is the starting point. But the data shows AI adoption is already tracking existing inequalities in England, creating a new layer of disadvantage for those who are already left behind.

The social grade AI divide

Highest social grade (AB)
92%
Middle grades (C1/C2)
86–88%
Lowest social grade (DE)
79%
Gap between AB and DE
13 pts

Who's being left furthest behind

NEET young people who've never used AI
1 in 5
Postgrad students who've used AI
93%
Young people thinking AI will mean fewer jobs
71%
Who think they'll earn less than parents
52%

"55% of jobs currently held by young people are likely to change because of AI. Young people feel this keenly. And the response from education does not meet the scale of this challenge."

β€” Public First / The King's Trust modelling, 2026
The teacher gap

Teachers are on the front line β€” without the tools they need.

Teachers are already using AI daily β€” but they're navigating it alone, without training, without guidance, and without a whole-school plan. 4 in 5 teachers use AI for teaching tasks, yet the system offers them almost no structured support.

πŸ“š
76%
of teachers now using AI tools in their practice (NEU, Feb 2026)
πŸŽ“
14%
confident in all 3 dimensions of AI literacy (Royal Society)
πŸ“‹
18%
have received any CPD or training on AI literacy
🏫
15%
work in schools with clear whole-school AI guidance
πŸ“–
<2%
say AI is covered across most subjects in their school
🚫
37%
say AI is not addressed at all in their teaching

"The dominant model of longitudinal evidence-gathering in education, built for a world of slow, periodic measurement, is no longer fit for purpose in an environment where AI can test and adapt in near real-time."

β€” Sir Anthony Seldon, Britain's Greatest Education Opportunity Ever, 2026
Global context

The world is moving. England is standing still.

The UK scores a perfect 100 on AI policy capacity β€” but ranks 64th in public sector adoption, behind Bangladesh, Uganda and Bhutan. Our competitors are already embedding AI into national education infrastructure.

πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

United Kingdom

Policy Capacity
1st (100/100)
AI Governance
7th (92.3)
Public Sector Adoption
64th (68.9)
Development & Diffusion
68.5 (4th)
Writes AI policy better than almost any country in the world β€” and deploys it worse than 60+ others
πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ͺ

Estonia

Programme
AI Leap (TI-HΓΌpe)
Scale
154 upper secondary schools, 20,000 students
Approach
National infrastructure, not procurement
Professional learning communities, subject-specific AI tools, OpenAI partnership from Jan 2026
πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬

Singapore

Platform
National Student Learning Space
AI Features
Maths assistant, short answer feedback, adaptive learning
Access
Every mainstream school
Tiered by age, mediated by teachers, studying AI's cognitive impact at national level
Proof of what's possible

AI4ALL: what inclusive AI education actually looks like.

AI4ALL's Ignite programme demonstrates that with the right support, underrepresented young people don't just close the gap β€” they outpace everyone. 68% of AI4ALL graduates secure a tech internship or full-time role, versus just 30% nationally.

Skills & career outcomes (2024–25)

+63%
agreed they now understand what makes a model interpretable
91%
felt more prepared to apply for internships as a result of the programme
96%
improved their CV/rΓ©sumΓ© as a result of participating
68%
of AI4ALL grads secured tech role β€” vs 30% nationally (2Γ— national rate)
$2M
Google.org investment to scale hands-on learning and Future of AI Education Council

Who AI4ALL reaches (2024–25)

Women and non-binary students
59%
Black, Latinx or Indigenous students
55%
Students receiving financial aid
71%
Future of AI Education Council (launched Oct 2025) 30 faculty from 20+ institutions working on Inclusive AI Learning, Responsible AI Curriculum, and Emerging Issues β€” with Google.org backing.
"AI4ALL really helped me understand… why everything works the way it does." β€” Fernando Peralta Castro, student, Moravian University
Policy in action

A new pathway β€” but delivery must keep pace.

PM Andy Burnham's announcement (July 2026) that every secondary school in England will offer technical subjects including AI and manufacturing from Year 10 is welcome. But the challenge is implementation β€” the gap between ambition and classroom reality.

Burnham's Technical Education Reform (July 2026)

Secondary schools to offer AI, manufacturing & technical subjects from age 14 β€” linked to local industries
🏭

Technical subjects available from Year 10, connected to local employers and clear pathways to work

πŸ“…

New pathways expected to be running in some areas by 2028 β€” V-levels post-16 from 2027

πŸ’·

Β£4,500 bursary for families who would lose out financially if their child chose an apprenticeship

πŸŽ“

Builds on Greater Manchester Baccalaureate (MBacc) β€” a model of balanced academic and technical learning

πŸ‘₯

1 million+ young people NEET β€” the highest level in 12+ years β€” demand urgent and systemic action

🀝

"We've had a system built for too long around the university route… we need an education that gives all young people a clear path in life."

FSM response

The FSM Education & Physical AI Framework.

We believe every young person β€” especially those with disabilities and from disadvantaged backgrounds β€” deserves to be a maker of Physical AI, not just a user of it. Our five-stage framework maps the journey from curiosity to contribution.

1

Encounter

Every young person meets a robot, a cobot or an assistive AI device β€” in school, at a community event, at a Maker Day

2

Understand

Structured AI literacy: how models are trained, what they can and can't do, why bias matters, who builds them

3

Create

Hands-on projects: building AI tools that solve real problems in their community β€” including accessibility challenges

4

Connect

Mentorship, industry links, internships β€” structured pathways from school into AI and Physical AI careers

5

Lead

Young people as AI champions in their schools and communities β€” carrying knowledge forward to peers and families

Physical AI in the Curriculum

Robotics, cobots, and assistive devices as hands-on learning tools β€” connecting AI to bodies, not just screens

Disability-Centred Design

Students with disabilities as co-designers of assistive Physical AI β€” lived experience as technical expertise

Teacher Empowerment

CPD pathways for educators β€” transforming reluctant adapters into confident AI champions in their school communities

FSM's policy asks β€” AI & Education

1

Mandatory AI literacy for every student from Key Stage 3 β€” covering how models are built, how they fail, and who they serve

2

Funded teacher CPD on AI literacy β€” every school to have at least one trained AI champion by 2027

3

Physical AI in schools β€” robots and assistive devices in every secondary school by 2028, linked to Burnham's technical education reforms

4

Equity-first rollout β€” prioritise schools in disadvantaged areas and students with SEND, closing the 13-point social grade AI gap

5

Lived-experience curriculum β€” disabled young people and their families as co-designers of AI education content, not just consumers

6

National Physical AI Skills Commission β€” mapping the workforce pipeline from education to Physical AI industry, with disability representation at every level

Help us build the education system young people deserve.

Every young person β€” especially those with disabilities and from disadvantaged communities β€” should have the chance to shape the AI-powered world they're inheriting. Join FSM and help make that real.

Get Involved β†’